tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19104126.post7628488154814366529..comments2023-04-28T04:51:00.087-07:00Comments on audacious ontology: absolutely absurd ....audacioushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12385776133396365078noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19104126.post-80450215507316755212007-02-17T07:40:00.000-08:002007-02-17T07:40:00.000-08:00alison ...the way i posted it; was sort of on purp...alison ...<BR/>the way i posted it; was sort of on purpose; was to draw attention to it. to see if people actually read what is going on in this situation. <BR/><BR/>probably should have posted it differently ...audacioushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12385776133396365078noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19104126.post-11589312363482168802007-02-17T07:26:00.000-08:002007-02-17T07:26:00.000-08:00You wouldn't have a group like this in Canada beca...You wouldn't have a group like this in Canada because you have same-sex marriage. And years before that, you had financial and legal protections for same-sex couples via common-law arrangement acceptance.<BR/><BR/>The US has NO recognition on a federal level and scant few within only a handful of states.<BR/><BR/>While I'm not sure I agree with the idea of this, it is what happens when the "Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19104126.post-1547310066756984642007-02-17T03:04:00.000-08:002007-02-17T03:04:00.000-08:00"some groups are actually so far out of left field...<I>"some groups are actually so far out of left field ...<BR/><BR/>let's hope canada doesn't have a group like this ..."</I><BR/><BR/>Are you being ironic here, Auda?<BR/>Because this is actually a very clever legal challenge to the assumptions behind restricting marriage to heterosexuals only.<BR/>If WDMA can't prove their case in the courts that marriage is primarily to provide the state with Alisonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09811694143714068436noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19104126.post-34527316746268433662007-02-17T02:59:00.000-08:002007-02-17T02:59:00.000-08:00OK.....am I reading this correctly- now "tradition...OK.....am I reading this correctly- now "traditional" marriage groups are targeting not only gay/lesbian couples but also heterosexual couples who choose not to have children.<BR/><BR/>You really, really have to wonder at the desperation of these people.Drew Adamickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03270675389686121812noreply@blogger.com