Monday, February 20, 2006

freedom of expression/crime

David Irving Convicted
February 20th 2006

Now that the “Notorious Holocaust Denier,” as the New York Times characterized David Irving, has pleaded guilty and faces three years in an Austrian prison for the crime of deviating from the official, Zionist-sanctioned and imposed history of the Second World War, we can expect triumphant ballyhoos from the Zionists, a screaming and obnoxious declaration of victory for the small outlaw nation of Israel and its endless blackmailing of millions of people who had nothing to do with Auschwitz and its discredited gas chambers.

“Mr. Irving’s trial came during a period of intense debate in Europe over freedom of expression, after European newspapers printed caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad that set off deadly protests worldwide,” notes the New York Times. In other words, straying from the Holocaust orthodoxy is a punishable crime while sacking the Prophet Muhammad is freedom of expression.

Of course, when you take a good hard look at the reason why the Prophet Muhammad was dragged through the mud of Europe, you soon understand why Flemming Rose, the “cultural” editor of Jyllands-Posten, still has a job and Irving will be packed off to prison.
source

1 comments:

audacious said...

I posted the article I came across as i found it interesting on how another perceives / compares the whole ordeal.

And the cartoon ... well i have no concrete answer for that.