Wednesday, January 11, 2006

so is bush, a terrorist


T.O. teen `indeed a terrorist,' U.S. insists
Prosecutor says Khadr deserves life
Hearing begins today in Guantanamo


Jan. 11, 2006. 01:00
MICHELLE SHEPHARD
thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article
_Type1&c=Article&cid=1136933413430&call_pageid=
968332188492&col=968793972154&t=TS_Home

GUANTANAMO , CUBAÑ Calling Toronto-born Omar Khadr a terrorist and mocking news stories that describe him as a tortured teenager, the chief U.S. military prosecutor says he wants to see Canada's only detainee on this naval base locked up for life.

Khadr, 19, is expected to appear before a military commission today for a pre-trial hearing on a charge of murder, but a tough-talking Col. Morris Davis began his prosecution in front of reporters yesterday.

"You'll see evidence when we get into the courtroom of the smiling face of Omar Khadr as he builds bombs to kill Americans," Davis said. "It's my belief that the evidence will show he is indeed a terrorist."

Khadr faces life in prison if convicted of murder, a charge stemming from a July 2002 grenade attack in Afghanistan that killed U.S. 1st Class Sgt. Christopher Speer and injured Sgt. Layne Morris. Khadr was shot in the chest, stomach and eye before being captured by U.S. forces at the age of 15.

Davis said it was "sometimes nauseating" to read descriptions of Khadr in the media including those that described him as almost blind and near death when captured near Khost, Afghanistan.

"You'll see pictures of Mr. Khadr that look like he's almost dead but thanks to the American medics, who stepped over their dead friends and tended to Mr. Khadr, he's alive today," Davis said. He noted that Sgt. Morris is blind in one eye as a result of his injuries and had to retire from the military.

One of the allegations facing Khadr is that he attended an Al Qaeda training camp as a young teenager.

Yesterday, Davis quipped: "These guys went to camp and you know they weren't making s'mores or learning how to tie knots. They were learning how to make bombs and kill Americans."

Khadr's hearing was originally set to begin yesterday but was postponed out of respect for the Muslim holiday of Eid Al Adha.

"Normally, Mr. Khadr and his family spent Eid with the Osama bin Laden family, so I'm sure he's upset he's here and not in Afghanistan with Osama bin Laden. He's a terrorist," Davis added at the end of his statement to reporters representing 14 international media organizations.

Khadr is the second youngest son of Ahmed Said Khadr, a reputed Canadian Al Qaeda financier and close associate with bin Laden. He was killed in October 2003 by Pakistani forces.

Davis also countered criticism of the tribunal process itself, in which the military serves as both prosecutor and judge. Civil rights and defence lawyers, as well as some foreign governments such as Britain, have argued the proceedings are unconstitutional and want the detainees tried in U.S. criminal courts.

"Some say we're making up the rules as we go along but the law has to adapt to today's environment," Davis told reporters, saying Al Qaeda is unlike any "enemy faced before."

"We've got nothing to be ashamed of in what we're doing here. So we want you, we want the public, we want the world to see that we're extending a full, fair and open trial to the terrorists that have attacked us. We're extending rights to them that they have never contemplated."

From the moment that you land at the U.S. naval base camp in Cuba, it's obvious that there's a concerted effort underway to refute claims of mistreatment and torture at the camp. Tours for journalists and other visitors always include a visit to Camp X-Ray, where four years ago today, the first terrorism suspects were detained. The outdoor wire cages that resemble kennels are now overgrown with vines and the only occupants are a family of local banana rats.

This is where photos were taken of kneeling, shackled detainees in blacked-out goggles and others being wheeled on gurneys to interrogation rooms. The photos sparked an outcry from human rights groups. Maj. Jeffrey Weir is quick to point out that some rights groups and media outlets still use these images to portray Guantanamo when it hasn't been used since April 2002.

Detainees are now kept at a centre known as Camp Delta, cut off from the rest of the base by hills of inhospitable terrain littered with cacti.

Built on a stunning coastline one detainees don't see through the mesh covering the fence the detention centre consists of four inner camps with varying degrees of security.

Camps 3 and 4 are used for what's known as "non-compliant" prisoners, those clad in orange and closely monitored. On a visit yesterday, one such detainee could be seen using a walker with guards walking with him on either side.

There's a small fenced-in recreation area where an arrow points to Mecca and gives the distance as 12,793 kilometres. In the cells, Qur'ans hang in surgical masks, so, as Cmdr. Catie Hanft explains, "we're aware where it is so we don't touch it."

Hanft has been at the base for four months and is in charge of all the guards inside the gate who promptly salute her and say "honour bound," as she passes.


A 42-year-old New Yorker, with green eyes and red hair, Hanft has acquired the name of "Red Hammer 1" since coming to the camp because she's known for her strict enforcement of the rules. She's personally hurt, she says, by allegations of torture of detainees in her custody.

"This does bother me because I know the sailors and soldiers here and I know they don't do the things people say they're doing."

Camp 4 is the only communal living space, where detainees are permitted to live in rooms with nine others and there's a common area where food is brought on metal picnic tables. They're all dressed in white and most have long beards and appear tired of the media attention and retreat into their rooms when cameras appear.

It's unlikely Khadr has ever been kept here. According to his Washington-based lawyer Muneer Ahmad, who visited him yesterday, he has been kept almost entirely in segregation, at a detention facility known as Camp 5, outside of Camp Delta.

As for Khadr's allegations of torture that the soldiers here refute, Ahmad said yesterday he has "credible evidence."

Read More...

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

a russian view

Condoleezza Rice wants Russia to obey her every single word
Stepan Korolev
01/10/2006 20:44
english.pravda.ru/main/18/88/354/16721_condoleezza.html


If Russia wants to be respected in the Group of Eight, the Russian administration needs to listen to what Ms. Rice is saying

Condoleezza Rice, the US Secretary of State, has won the respectable reputation of an iron lady in world politics. The literal translation of this expression has settled down in the Russian language as well. However, Russian people usually associate Ms. Rice with a different type of woman, which translates into English as 'virago.' Condoleezza Rice does not think twice to start a vigorous fight against all manifestations of evil and injustice, which she may notice in the world.

Ms. Rice has recently paid special attention to the natural gas conflict between Russia and Ukraine. The criticism from the US top official followed shortly after Russia and Ukraine signed an agreement regulating prices on natural gas and its transit via Ukraine's territory. The agreement put an end to the gas dispute. Apparently, it was not the end which Ms. Rice wanted to see. The Secretary of State did not hesitate to start another fight of hers to defend the "victim of gas blackmail" - Ukraine - and show the "blackmailer" - Russia - its place.

Having a breakfast with reporters one fine morning, Condi criticized Russia for using its fuel resources as a political weapon. According to Rice, Russia's attempt to cut gas supplies to Ukraine was a certain punishment for the "orange revolution" and the pro-Western stance of the Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko.

Condoleezza Rice did not try to mask her irritation about the fact that Russia dared to use its right and raise prices on fuel. "It was not a good week from the point of view of Russia's demonstrating that it is now prepared to act ... as an energy supplier in a responsible way," Rice told reporters. "When you say you want to be a part of the international economy and you want to be a responsible actor in the international economy, then you play by its rules. I think that kind of behavior is going to continue to draw comment about the distance between Russian behavior and something like this and what would be expected of a responsible member of the G-8," Rice said.

As a matter of fact, the US Secretary of State repeated, albeit in a more politically correct way, the scandalous statement from Ukraine's Deputy Foreign Affairs Minister, Anton Buteiko. The Ukrainian official called Russia's Gazprom a "smuggler and robber" only one day before the Russian gas monopolist signed the above-mentioned agreement with Ukraine's Naftogaz. Most likely, Rice did not have a wish to look into the matter of the gas dispute between Russia and Ukraine. Moreover, Ms. Rice virtually ignored Ukraine's confession to committing illegal activities during the transit of Russia's gas export to Europe. It is not ruled out that the US administration was not aware of that at all.

Brushing all ethical issues aside, one may say that Condoleezza Rice had a specific scenario of the Russia-Ukraine gas dispute, in which Russia was marked as "a bad guy." Since Ukraine was a "good guy" in the standoff, the US Secretary of State was supposed to morally support Ukraine and shake her fist at Russia. In other words, if Russia wants to be respected in the Group of Eight, the Russian administration needs to listen to what Ms. Rice is saying.

Being outspoken is very typical of Ms. Rice. Many remember her instructions to George W. Bush regarding USA's attitude to those countries which did not support the anti-Iraqi coalition. "We need to ignore Germany, punish France and forgive Russia," she once said.

Condoleezza Rice's straightforward approach to solving complicated geopolitical issues eventually aggravated the crisis between the USA and Old Europe. The consequences of Rice's interference in the economic conflict between Russia and Ukraine are still to come. Condoleezza Rice's uncouth and thoughtless remarks can be compared to a sincere, albeit a totally unprofessional strip-show.

Until recently it was believed that the US Secretary of State is a champion of freedom, democracy and market economy in the whole world. It turns out now that Condoleezza Rice believes that the transparent scheme of relations between Russia and Ukraine in the gas field exposes Russia as an unreliable fuel supplier. Moreover, Ms. Rice believes that the introduction of market prices on natural gas is a gradual and slow process for the two countries.

Very interesting, isn't it? The Ukrainian Prime Minister has recently assured his nation that the USA was ready to recognize Ukraine a country with market economy in January of 2006. Maybe Ms. Rice wanted to make Ukraine understand that it was too early for the country to be rewarded with the long-expected status? It is not ruled out that the US Secretary of State intends to use the policy of double standards with Ukraine: to acknowledge the existence of the market economy there and forbid market prices on gas for Russia?

Condoleezza Rice's predecessor on the position, Madeleine Albright, was also an iron lady. Albright, however, was not noticed for the absurd straightforwardness of thinking. It is not a matter of Condoleezza Rice's lack of education: Ms. Rice was a favorite student of Madeleine Albright's father, Josef Korbel, a professor of the Denver University. Condoleezza Rice is not a woman; she is a function. No wonder she is still a Ms, not Mrs.

The mother of all iron ladies, Margaret Thatcher, was a family woman. Politics and nothing but politics has become the family life of Condoleezza Rice. Who on Earth will agree to build a relationship with a woman, who is ready to stand up and fight at any moment? Ms. Rice looks good for her profession indeed, but she has already celebrated her 50th birthday. Lonely women usually become resentful and unrestrained at this age.

Vladimir Zhirinovsky, a notorious Russian politician, the leader of the Liberal and Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR) gave Pravda.Ru the following comments regarding Ms. Rice's statement on the gas dispute between Russia and Ukraine.

"Condoleezza Rice is a very cruel, offended woman who lacks men's attention. She needs to be taken to a company of soldiers and it would be just fine. Releasing such stupid remarks gives her the feeling of being fulfilled. This is the only way for her to attract men's attention. The States needs to practice the old Soviet tradition when both single women and single men were not allowed to take responsible state positions," Zhirinovsky said.

Read More...

harper and his promises

Stephen Harper admits his “promise” on “fiscal imbalance” will cost $40 billion
January 10, 2006
liberal.ca/news_e.aspx?id=11365



Conservative Leader Stephen Harper admitted during the January 10 Leaders Debate that his promises on the so-called “fiscal imbalance” will put Canada into deficit or force him to radically slash the federal government.

Mr. Harper stated during the Leaders Debate: “I have said a number of times that I'm very interested in the Seguin Report.”

THE FACTS

The Seguin Report recommended an initial $8 billion annual transfer to the provinces, and will likely mean $40 billion over five years.

Where does Stephen Harper plan to find $40 billion extra dollars above his tax cuts and other spending promises?

Read More...

israeli strike on iran

Israelis plan pre-emptive strike on Iran
IAN BRUCE, Defence Correspondent
January 10 2006
theherald.co.uk/news/53948.html


Israel is updating plans for a pre-emptive strike on Iran's nuclear facilities which could be launched as soon as the end of March, according to military and intelligence sources.

The news comes as Germany yesterday warned Tehran's regime that it would face "consequences" if it removes UN seals from portions of its atomic programme and resumes enrichment of fuel which could be diverted for military use in breach of international agreements.

The Israeli raids would be carried out by long-range F-15E bombers and cruise missiles against a dozen key sites and are designed to set Tehran's weapons programme back by up to two years.
Pilots at the Israeli air force's elite 69 squadron have been briefed on the plan and have conducted rehearsals for their missions.

The prime targets would be the uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, 150 miles south of Tehran, a heavy-water production site at Arak, 120 miles south-west of the capital, and a site near Isfahan in central Iran which makes the uranium hexafluoride gas vital to the arms manufacturing process.

Sources say one, possibly two airfields in Kurdish northern Iraq have been earmarked as launch-points to reduce flying time over Iran.

The Iranians have meanwhile dispersed production facilities across hundreds of miles of remote countryside to make a single, knockout blow more difficult.

They have also ringed the sites, some of them deep underground, with missile batteries and radar-controlled anti-aircraft guns.

Part of the reason for an acceleration of Israel's contingency strike plans is that Russia agreed last month to sell Tehran £700m-worth of advanced SA-15 Gauntlet mobile missile systems.
Some are believed to be destined for defence of Iran's Bushehr nuclear plant on the Gulf coast, which Russian engineers are helping to build.

Although Western military strategists think an attack on Tehran's scattered sites would be fraught with difficulties and could not be carried out without loss to the attacking forces, few doubt Israel's commitment to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear firepower.

An Israeli source said: "We believe Iran will have useable nuclear weapons by 2007 unless something is done to prevent it. If Tehran is allowed to start enrichment of uranium, it will be too late.

"Underground facilities have to be supplied with air, water and fuel from the surface. They also have entrances which are vulnerable to conventional attack. Close down the infrastructure and you close down the facility."

Israel is updating plans for a pre-emptive strike on Iran's nuclear facilities which could be launched as soon as the end of March, according to military and intelligence sources.

The news comes as Germany yesterday warned Tehran's regime that it would face "consequences" if it removes UN seals from portions of its atomic programme and resumes enrichment of fuel which could be diverted for military use in breach of international agreements.

The Israeli raids would be carried out by long-range F-15E bombers and cruise missiles against a dozen key sites and are designed to set Tehran's weapons programme back by up to two years.
Pilots at the Israeli air force's elite 69 squadron have been briefed on the plan and have conducted rehearsals for their missions.

The prime targets would be the uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, 150 miles south of Tehran, a heavy-water production site at Arak, 120 miles south-west of the capital, and a site near Isfahan in central Iran which makes the uranium hexafluoride gas vital to the arms manufacturing process.

Sources say one, possibly two airfields in Kurdish northern Iraq have been earmarked as launch-points to reduce flying time over Iran.

The Iranians have meanwhile dispersed production facilities across hundreds of miles of remote countryside to make a single, knockout blow more difficult.

They have also ringed the sites, some of them deep underground, with missile batteries and radar-controlled anti-aircraft guns.

Part of the reason for an acceleration of Israel's contingency strike plans is that Russia agreed last month to sell Tehran £700m-worth of advanced SA-15 Gauntlet mobile missile systems.
Some are believed to be destined for defence of Iran's Bushehr nuclear plant on the Gulf coast, which Russian engineers are helping to build.

Although Western military strategists think an attack on Tehran's scattered sites would be fraught with difficulties and could not be carried out without loss to the attacking forces, few doubt Israel's commitment to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear firepower.

An Israeli source said: "We believe Iran will have useable nuclear weapons by 2007 unless something is done to prevent it. If Tehran is allowed to start enrichment of uranium, it will be too late.

"Underground facilities have to be supplied with air, water and fuel from the surface. They also have entrances which are vulnerable to conventional attack. Close down the infrastructure and you close down the facility."

Read More...

charges should be at bush

Aljazeera memo: Two to face court
Tuesday 10 January 2006
english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/3720DB00-CB1F-47BB-84B4-3B0DD376A4DE.htm


Two Britons have been charged under the Official Secrets Act

Two men are to appear in a London court on Tuesday to face charges over the leak of an official memo revealing that US President George Bush discussed bombing Aljazeera.

The pair - David Keogh, a former employee of the cabinet office, and Leo O'Connor, a researcher for a former Labour member of parliament - have been charged under Britain’s Official Secrets Act.
The leaked memo details a conversation that Bush had with Tony Blair, the British prime minister, in April 2004.

In course of the conversation, Bush reportedly mooted the idea of bombing the headquarters of Aljazeera in Doha, Qatar. Blair subsequently talked the US president out of taking such military action against the Arab broadcaster.

Stung by the leak, the United States denied that Bush had ever seriously contemplated bombing Aljazeera. The British government also imposed a gag order on the media, prohibiting any further publication from the memo.

Leak

The London-based Guardian newspaper meanwhile reported that two Labour MPs had defied the Official Secrets Act to pass on key contents of the memo.

Tony Clarke – a former MP for Northampton South – first obtained the memo and consulted his parliamentary colleague, Peter Kilfoyle. The two MPs then decided in October to reveal key information in the memo to a Democrat supporter in the United States.

The controversial contents of the memo were finally published in London’s Daily Mirror soon after Keogh and O’Connor were charged.

The leak cast fresh doubts on US claims that past US attacks on Aljazeera offices were accidental.
In November 2001, Aljazeera's office in Kabul was bombed. In April 2003, Aljazeera journalist Tariq Ayub was killed in Baghdadh when its office was struck during a US bombing campaign.

Read More...

Monday, January 9, 2006

debate martin defends

Prime Minister Paul Martin Defends Canadian Values
January 09, 2006
liberal.ca/news_e.aspx?id=11352


Prime Minister Paul Martin emerged from the January 9th English-language leaders’ debate as a leader with a vision of Canada as a united society built on compassion, generosity, sharing and understanding which recognizes the United States as our neighbour, not our nation.

“I don't believe that Canada was built on American conservative values,” said the Prime Minister. “It was built on compassion, on generosity, on sharing and understanding.

”America is our neighbour. It's not our nation. We have our own set of values, and that's why we're so strong in this country.”

The Prime Minister also put forward a bold new plan to protect the rights of Canadians, suggesting Parliament should eliminate the federal government’s ability to invoke the Notwithstanding Clause in cases where individual rights and equality rights are at stake.

“Unlike most Canadians, Mr. Harper has said the Charter of Rights has serious flaws. His Justice Critic has said we should use the Notwithstanding Clause to take away the rights of Canadians,” said the Prime Minister.

“I think the Charter defines Canada…the first act of the Liberal government will be to be to strengthen the Charter…by supporting a constitutional amendment to remove the federal government’s ability to use the Notwithstanding [Clause] to overturn the Supreme Court of Canada and take away Charter Rights.”

Prime Minister Martin also directly confronted Bloc Quebecois Leader Gilles Duceppe on national unity. The Prime Minister made a strong defence of Quebec’s place in Canada, clearly recognizing the unique contribution its culture and language make to Canadian identity.

“Nearly 150 years ago we came together and we recognized that we would be a far greater nation if we could pull together than if we pulled apart,” said the Prime Minister. “Quebec is entitled to respect for its place in Confederation, recognition of its specific character, its language, and its culture, and this is a huge asset for our country.”

For his part, Mr. Harper dropped the moderate approach he had projected for the first four weeks of the campaign, proposing a radical right-wing plan to protect property rights in the Charter.

“I think the Charter should be strengthened. I think there should be property rights protection in our Charter,” said Mr. Harper.

In the U.S. such right-wing thinking in the 1920s and 30s led to the elimination of workplace safety law, child labour law, and minimum wage law. Mr. Harper’s proposal to “protect” property rights would leave left workers, children, the poor and the environment to fend for themselves.

Mr. Harper also tried to mislead Canadians into believing he had disclosed all of his leadership campaign donations.

“The lists of contributors were made available some time ago, in fact, in some cases a couple years back. I'm not sure why suddenly this question is coming up tonight,” said Mr. Harper.

Mr. Harper has never provided a full list of who funded his 2002 campaign for the leadership of the Canadian Alliance.

Tonight’s debate made it perfectly clear that there is a vast difference in values between Prime Minister Paul Martin and Conservative Leader Stephen Harper. On January 23rd, it will be up to Canadians to decide whose values reflect their own.

Read More...

settle for nothing less


Read More...

us at it again with the media

US troops seize award-winning Iraqi journalist
Monday January 9, 2006
The Guardian
guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,1682246,00.html


American troops in Baghdad yesterday blasted their way into the home of an Iraqi journalist working for the Guardian and Channel 4, firing bullets into the bedroom where he was sleeping with his wife and children.


Ali Fadhil, who two months ago won the Foreign Press Association young journalist of the year award, was hooded and taken for questioning. He was released hours later.

Dr Fadhil is working with Guardian Films on an investigation for Channel 4's Dispatches programme into claims that tens of millions of dollars worth of Iraqi funds held by the Americans and British have been misused or misappropriated.

The troops told Dr Fadhil that they were looking for an Iraqi insurgent and seized video tapes he had shot for the programme. These have not yet been returned.
The director of the film, Callum Macrae, said yesterday: "The timing and nature of this raid is extremely disturbing. It is only a few days since we first approached the US authorities and told them Ali was doing this investigation, and asked them then to grant him an interview about our findings.

"We need a convincing assurance from the American authorities that this terrifying experience was not harassment and a crude attempt to discourage Ali's investigation."

Dr Fadhil was asleep with his wife, their three-year-old daughter, Sarah, and seven-month-old son, Adam, when the troops forced their way in.

"They fired into the bedroom where we were sleeping, then three soldiers came in. They rolled me on to the floor and tied my hands. When I tried to ask them what they were looking for they just told me to shut up," he said.

Read More...

us kills innocent in pakistan

Pakistan protests to U.S. over incident
By SADAQAT JAN
seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1107AP_Pakistan_US_Protest.htm

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan --
Pakistan has protested to the U.S. military in Afghanistan over firing at a Pakistani village near the Afghan border that killed eight people, the Foreign Ministry said Monday.

Ministry spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam said cross-border firing from Afghanistan killed the people in Saidgi village in the tribal region of North Waziristan early Saturday, but added that Pakistan was still trying to determine whether U.S. helicopters landed there as claimed by local elders.

"We have protested to the coalition forces because they are responsible for security on the other side," Aslam told a news conference in the capital, Islamabad.

"The Americans did not enter our territory. We did receive fire from across the border," said Aslam, without elaborating. "The Americans have denied their troops were involved in this attack, but we have initiated an inquiry into what exactly happened."

In Kabul, U.S. military spokesman Lt. Mike Cody said he would look into the alleged incident. On Saturday, he said he had no reports of U.S. forces firing on a village in Pakistan.

About 20,000 U.S. troops are in Afghanistan. But neighboring Pakistan, a key U.S. ally in its war on terrorism, says they aren't allowed to operate on its side of the rugged, sometimes poorly defined border.

Residents said the firing came before dawn Saturday at cleric Maulana Noor Mohammad's home, killing eight and wounding nine, including women and children.

Momin Khan, a tribal elder, said he and other tribal elders complained to the area's top commander, Maj. Gen. Akram Sahi, that U.S. helicopters launched the attack, landed and took away five tribesmen, then flew toward Afghanistan.

He said Sahi had assured the elders that Pakistan's military was investigating.

About an hour after Saturday's blast, suspected Islamic militants raided a checkpoint on the Afghanistan-Pakistan border 30 miles away, killing eight Pakistani security forces deployed to stop militants from entering or leaving Afghanistan.

On Monday, assailants also fired rockets at a security checkpoint along the border and exchanged fire with troops west of Miran Shah, wounding three soldiers.

The area is a known hide-out for alleged al-Qaida and Taliban sympathizers and extremists, and Pakistan has deployed around 70,000 military personnel to hunt them down. Last month, a senior al-Qaida suspect from Egypt, Hamza Rabia, was killed in the area. Pakistan denied residents' claims that he died in a U.S. missile strike.

Read More...

to suit themselves, again

Washington moves to quash Guantanamo detainee appeals
09 Jan 2006
cbc.ca/story/world/national/2006/01/09/guantanamo-bush060109.html


White House lawyers will ask a Federal Court on Monday to dismiss lawsuits brought by hundreds of people being held at Guantanamo Bay.

Last week, U.S. justice officials informed federal judges in Washington the department would formally ask for the dismissal of 186 cases involving 300 prisoners.

Monday's move comes 10 days after U.S. President George W. Bush signed a military bill containing an amendment restricting Federal Courts from hearing habeas corpus petitions from Guantanamo detainees.

According to U.S. law, prisoners can use the right of habeas corpus to challenge the legality of their detentions.

But the new amendment allows the D.C. appellate court to review the results of Guantanamo military tribunals. Critics say the tribunals are unfair because the detainees are not represented by lawyers.

The White House has tangled with the Federal and Supreme Courts over its detainee policies for several years.

In 2004, the Supreme Court gave prisoners at Guantanamo Bay the right to challenge their detention in Federal Court, despite Washington's argument that the camp's location on the eastern tip of Cuba meant it was out of the Federal Court's jurisdiction.

The United States is holding about 500 people at the military base. It says they could be terrorists. Most were captured during the invasion of Afghanistan in late 2001. Some detainees have been held for four years without charge.

Carl Levin, the Michigan Democratic senator who crafted the amendment, has criticized the Bush administration's move. He said the amendment can't be applied retroactively.

"I'm not surprised that the Justice Department can make any argument that they want," said Levin.

"They've made all kinds of arguments relative to detainees at Guantanamo that have not been accepted by the courts, and this as far as I'm concerned is another one."

Justice officials say detainees have been treated fairly.

"We are aware of no other country that has provided their enemies with such extensive legal review during an ongoing conflict," said Justice Department spokesperson Tasia Scolinos.

Read More...

more reasons to vote liberal

Tape Reveals Conservative Justice Critic Advocates Use of Notwithstanding Clause
January 09, 2006
liberal.ca/news_e.aspx?id=11344

Ottawa –
Conservative Justice Critic Vic Toews has called for the use of the notwithstanding clause to revoke the right to equal marriage in Canada, which is an equality right as defined by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Vic Toews has also put forward a plan to have Supreme Court Justices face a public committee before their appointment could be approved. This suggests judges would be subject to scrutiny of their views on social issues, to prevent what Mr. Toews has called “radical liberal judges” from implementing “their own social agenda.”

In a 2003 interview with a far-right American organization, Toews stated:

“The second question is what are the chances of the Supreme Court overturning that? I’m very pessimistic, I think it needs to go to the Supreme Court, I think we need to hear from the Supreme Court on this issue because, remember, in Canada, Parliament has the ultimate tool. It’s called the notwithstanding clause, section 33, so that when the courts make a fundamental error in jurisdiction, Parliament can overrule it for a period of five years by an Act of Parliament. That is renewable, so they can do it over and over again. So what I think we need to hear is from the Supreme Court of Canada. And then if the Supreme Court continues on that radical agenda we need to push for the federal government to use this constitutional mechanism to ensure that courts understand that they not to interfere with social policy matters and stay within there realm of judicial interpretations.” (listen to this quote)

Toews also questioned the integrity of Canada’s judiciary, saying “we have seen these radical liberal judges who have their own social agenda coming to the bench and forgetting that their responsibility is to interpret the law and not to make law. And so we are very, very concerned about that.” (listen to this quote)

Toews made the comments in an interview with Concerned Women Today, a “broadcast ministry” run by Concerned Women for America (CWA), an American organization that seeks “to protect traditional values that support the Biblical design of the family.”

CWA founder Beverly LaHaye started her organization to respond to the advances of feminism after watching the National Organization for Women’s founder Betty Friedan on television in 1978. CWA identifies feminism as “anti-god, anti-family.” CWA has also identified state-level Equal Rights Amendments (ERAs) as responsible for the breakdown of families: “The ERA proposes the elimination of our God-given roles as men and women, resulting in the redefinition – and eventual destruction – of family.”

These comments are particularly disturbing given Mr. Toews prominent position within the Conservative Caucus, which was demonstrated when he stood beside Leader Stephen Harper to announce the party’s justice platform in Toronto on January 5.

From a man who would likely be Canada’s next Justice Minister if Stephen Harper and the Conservatives were to form government, this willingness to use the notwithstanding clause to take away a Charter right is deplorable. With one vacancy on the Supreme Court already, and others possible during the next mandate, Mr. Toews’ radical views and plans to reform the appointment process suggest that the rights of Canadians may hang in the balance.

Full audio of Mr. Toews' appearance on Concerned Women Today (mp3)
Full transcript of Mr. Toews' comments

Read More...

jordan extorted by us

Jordan approves two new security laws
Monday 09 January 2006
english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/9215333D-6A72-4BED-9E9E-95C7B1C02FCA.htm



Jordan approved a law protecting Americans from prosecution

Aljazeera's correspondent in Amman reports that the Jordanian parliament has approved two laws of an international nature.

One of the laws approved on Sunday shields US citizens from war crimes prosecution in the International Criminal Court, the state news agency Petra reports.

The other law is directed at fighting terrorism financing, Aljazeera's correspondent said.

The Jordanian parliament witnessed heated debates between those opposing what they consider double standards in the interpretation of "terrorism" and those supportive of a law they view as advancing Jordan's political and economic interests, Aljazeera added..

Petra said the law was approved on Sunday by a majority in the 110-member house, without giving a breakdown of the vote.

MPs who voted in favour argued that its approval served the political and economic interests of Jordan without harming its sovereignty, according to Petra.

Citizens' immunity

Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch (HRW) last month appealed for the proposed law to be voted down.

In July, the house threw out the government bill that endorses a deal with Washington to give US citizens immunity from prosecution by the ICC. But it was endorsed by the upper house, which sent it back to the lower house.

Ali Abu-Sukar, a Jordanian lawmaker, told the AP that "the agreement contradicts the Rome accord ... and in our days the Americans are the people who now commit war crimes".

Abu-Sukar is a member of Jordan's largest opposition group, the Islamic Action Front, which is the political arm of the Muslim Brotherhood Movement.

"It is humiliating and will twist arms because the United States had threatened to cut economic aid to countries which reject this agreement," he said.

Amnesty and HRW said: "Jordan's parliament should reject an agreement that would shield US citizens and personnel under Jordan jurisdiction from ICC prosecution for war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide.

Sovereignty

In its July rejection, the lower house said the bill "undermines the sovereignty of Jordan", a key Arab ally of the US and a main recipient of US financial assistance.

Washington vehemently opposes the ICC, the world's first permanent tribunal for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Jordan remains one of America's staunchest allies among Arabs

The US has waged a global campaign for immunity pacts since the court came into existence in July 2002.

It has threatened to cut off aid to countries that refuse to sign bilateral immunity deals.

The US fears the court could become a forum for politically motivated prosecutions of US citizens, especially soldiers deployed abroad.

Jordan's King Abdullah II signed the so-called Article 98 immunity agreement during a visit to Washington last December.

At the end of August, George Bush, the US president, waived for six months a restriction on millions of dollars in aid to Jordan, which could have been blocked over Amman's membership in the ICC.

Read More...

Sunday, January 8, 2006

germany says close prison

German Chancellor calls on US to close Guantanamo prison
kuna.net.kw/Home/Story.aspx?Language=en&DSNO=803473

BERLIN, Jan 8 (KUNA) --
German Chancellor Angela Merkel called Sunday on the US to close its prison in Guantanamo, Cuba, where suspects of international terrorism have been detained.

"Such a facility as in Guantanamo has no right to exist in its present form, " she told the German weekly magazine Der Spiegel.

"It is necessary to find other means and ways for dealing with prisoners of war," said Merkel in a press conference held after a closed-door meeting of her party.

Merekel, who intends to pay her first official visit to the US on January 12, said that she would raise this topic at talks with US President George Bush.

Read More...

in rumour is there any truth

POL-IRAQ-US-DEAL
No deals with deposed Iraqi president -- US diplomat
KUNA 082054 Jan 06NNNN
kuna.net.kw/Home/Story.aspx?Language=en&DSNO=803535

BAGHDAD, Jan 8 (KUNA) --
A US diplomat based here denied news reports on talks between the US and the deposed Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.

Political advisor for the US embassy here, Robert Ford, told KUNA that no talks were being secretly held with Hussein to reach a deal as reported by a London-based Arabic speaking newspaper.

"No secret talks between the US and Saddam Hussein... and it is impossible for us to think about this," he said.

The US would increase its military presence in Iraq if things went wrong instead of striking a deal with Hussein, he added.

He also denied any intent to release Saddam Hussein, who is currently facing trial by an Iraqi court for crimes committed against humanity.

The diplomat also said he was optimistic about a near arrest of the Jordanian terror suspect Abu-Musaab Al-Zarkawi. (end) mhg.

Read More...

is it fate

Palestinians Won’t Miss Sharon
Richard H. Curtiss
Sunday, 8, January, 2006
arabnews.com/?page=7§ion=0&article=75938&d=8&m=1&y=2006


Palestinians are not weeping for “the butcher of Beirut,” Ariel Sharon, as he battles for his life. One of the world’s most ruthless leaders, Sharon reminds this writer of the Assyrians of more than 3,000 years ago who made a point of carrying out bloodthirsty acts of terror. They then made sure that everyone knew the details of what they had done. As a result, their Near Eastern neighbors were so frightened and intimidated that they would do anything to keep the Assyrians out of their neighborhood.

Sharon’s activities over more than half a century have left behind him a wide swath of destruction. Early in his career he was given command of “counter terror” Unit 101, and directed a massacre in the West Bank village of Qibya in 1953. Sharon’s special forces slipped into the village, blocked the doors of the homes of sleeping villagers and then blew up the occupants. UN observers later counted 60 bodies.

The Israeli government later claimed that the massacre was committed by so-called “Israeli frontier settlers.” It was only after members of Unit 101 began boasting to other Israelis about what they had done, that they publicly acknowledged they had been carrying out terror raids throughout the West Bank.

In another Unit 101 terror raid against Palestinian civilians, Israeli commandos went to the West Bank border in 1955 and seized six young Palestinian shepherds, methodically stabbing five of them to death. They then released the youngest boy so that he would return to the village to tell what had happened to the others.

As Sharon helped prepare for the 1956 attack on the Suez Canal, he made extremely reckless decisions that nearly ended his military career. He led a series of bloody clashes against Arab forces, including a provocative 1955 attack on Egyptian troops in Gaza and a 1956 attack on Qalqilya. His aggressive policies in the north, on the border with Syria, so inflamed relations between the two countries that Sharon was ordered to limit his operations. Four young Israeli battalion commanders, including future chiefs of staff Mordechai Gur and Rafael Eitan, accused Sharon of exceeding his orders and needlessly sending Israeli military personnel to their deaths.

Some two decades later, Sharon nearly caused a disastrous confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union during the 1973 Arab-Israeli war. He already had taken his troops into a counterattack across the Suez Canal when Egypt and Israel, under pressure from their Soviet and American mentors, agreed to a cease-fire. Totally ignoring the agreement, Sharon continued to cut off Egyptian units from their supply lines. Moscow finally told Washington that if Israel did not stop this unauthorized war, Russian troops would.

Sharon began planning to invade Lebanon in 1981, when he was minister of defense. Ten months later, however, he had yet to find a pretext for an assault, since Palestinian forces were observing a cease-fire along the Lebanese-Israeli border guaranteed by the US in the summer of 1981. Sharon finally seized upon the excuse of an attempted assassination of Israel’s ambassador to London. He prevented an Israeli intelligence officer from informing Israel’s Cabinet that the thwarted assassins were not from the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), so that the Israeli Cabinet would not abort what Sharon told them was merely a strike against the PLO in Lebanon.

Yacov Guterman, an Israeli whose only son was killed in the battle of Beaufort Castle at the beginning of Sharon’s invasion of Lebanon, has written: “If they [Prime Minister Menachem Begin and Defense Minister Ariel Sharon] have only a spark of conscience and humanity, may my great pain pursue them forever, the suffering of a father in Israel whose world has been destroyed.”

From a military point of view, Sharon’s invasion of Lebanon was a seemingly brilliant campaign. He had assured Prime Minister Menachem Begin that he would stop after seizing PLO positions on the Lebanese border, moving no more than a few kilometers into Lebanon. He had no intention of following his stated plan, however, and, as the world knows, instead headed toward Beirut.

In an attempt to batter the Lebanese into submission, the Israeli siege of Beirut went on day and night. In the midst of it, an unexpected event interrupted Sharon’s plans. The reckless and conniving Lebanese President Bashir Gemayel was killed and his older and less audacious brother, Amin, took over. Sharon, who had been on good terms with both brothers, paid a condolence call on the Gemayel family, during which he appears to have suggested that the family avenge Bashir’s death. There was no written transcript of the discussion, but the following day Sharon’s forces moved forward to the edge of the Sabra and Shatila Palestinian refugee camps.

Israeli forces had assembled 150 Lebanese Maronite militiamen and trucked them to the site. For two days, the militiamen slaughtered Palestinian men, women and children while the Israeli troops provided food, water and ammunition for the Maronites so they could continue the killing. When the Maronites needed illumination, the Israelis provided it. As word of the atrocity seeped out, members of the world press burst into the camps.

Newsmen saw that bodies of the victims were being bulldozed and covered up as rapidly as possible. The Israelis later said that 600 victims had been buried, but according to the International Red Cross, at least 2,000 Palestinians were dead. Hundreds of them are still buried in a mound that is now covered over by a soccer field and others may have been concealed elsewhere.

Israel’s Kahan Commission later found that Sharon had “indirect responsibility for failing to foresee and prevent the massacre” and banned him from serving again as defense minister.

Sharon set out to clear his name in an American court by filing a libel suit against Time magazine over its allegations of his conduct relating to the massacres at Sabra and Shatila. Although the jury did not find that the magazine had libeled Sharon, not waiting for a final verdict, the Israeli press declared Sharon had won a “moral victory.”

Meanwhile, Begin decided he had been deceived by Sharon into invading Lebanon and retired, spending the rest of his life in near-seclusion. More recently, Sharon incited the Al-Aqsa intifada with his Sept. 28, 2000 “visit” to Jerusalem’s Haram Al Sharif-on the eve of the election in which he was running for prime minister against the Labor incumbent, Ehud Barak.

Over the years, people seem to have forgotten the viciousness of Sharon’s military record. Even his sobriquet “the butcher of Beirut” has morphed into “the bulldozer,” or similar nicknames indicating courage and resolution. Even the bulldozer nickname, however, is the result of a chilling remark he made as candidate for prime minister. Asked what he would do about Palestinians from Beit Jala shooting at the illegal Jewish settlement of Gilo, Sharon replied, “I would eliminate the first row of houses in Beit Jala.” And if the shooting continued? “I would eliminate the second row of houses; and so on. I know the Arabs...For them, there is nothing more important than their house. So, under me you will not see a child shot next to his father. It is better to level an entire village with bulldozers-row after row.”

While once again on Jan. 4 President Bush called Sharon “a man of courage and peace,” in the past 50 years Palestinians have seen few peaceful acts by Israel’s prime minister. In fact, if Sharon had any intention of making peace with his neighbors, he would have accepted the olive branch Arab countries offered him in 2002. When King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia was still Crown Prince, he convinced Arab League members meeting in Beirut that March to agree to grant Israel full recognition if the Jewish state would return to its 1967 borders-giving it 78 percent of historic Palestine. The Saudi peace plan, which basically reiterates the land-for-peace formula of UN Resolution 242, is the only solution upon which virtually the entire world has agreed.

The only countries to reject this Arab compromise are Israel itself, and by its silent acquiescence, the United States.

Read More...

more us dead

Twelve die in US copter crash in Iraq
08/01/2006
afp.com/english/news/stories/060108175359.h1dgezuh.html

A US military helicopter crashed in Iraq, killing all 12 on board, while five more US soldiers died in the west of the country, the US military announced.


2006 brings the total of 29 us military fatalities so far in iraq.

Read More...

gun problem

canada and mexico have had increased gun violence problems, and in part we can thank the us for that.

Canada blames U.S. for gun violence
cnn.com/2005/WORLD/americas/12/27/canada.crime.ap/

Guns Flow Easily Into Mexico From the U.S.
latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-guns8jan08,1,933952.story?coll=la-headlines-world

Read More...

Saturday, January 7, 2006

middle east handbook

Read More...

conservative up income tax

TORY PLAN WOULD SCRAP LIBERAL TAX CUT ON LOW INCOME EARNERS

A Tory plan to raise personal income taxes on low income earners is
part of an overall tax strategy that will result in more tax relief for
Canadians, Tory MP Jason Kenney said Friday.

http://www.cbc.ca/story/canadavotes2006/national/2006/01/06/taxes-tory060122.html

Fact Check: Conservatives Would Put Low-Income Earners Back on the Tax Rolls

Harper Would Raise Income Taxes: Conservatives Would Tax Middle and Lower Income Canadians to Give to the Rich

Read More...

al-qaeda hails us troop cut

Zawahri hails US troop cut in Iraq as victory of Islam
Saturday January 07, 2006
jang.com.pk/thenews/jan2006-daily/07-01-2006/main/main11.htm

CAIRO:
In a videotape aired on Friday, al-Qaeda’s No 2 Ayman al-Zawahri praised Islam’s victory in forcing a reduction of US troops in Iraq. "If I was comforting the Islam nation for its crisis of Pakistan’s earthquake, I today congratulate it and bless the Islamic victory in Iraq," al-Zawahri said in the two-minute excerpt aired by Al-Jazeera satellite.

Wearing a white turban and gray robe and seated next to an automatic rifle, al-Zawahri, waved his finger for emphasis as he spoke in the video, which the Al-Jazeera said, was dated in December.

"You remember I told you more than a year ago that the American withdrawal from Iraq is only a matter of time, and here they are now ... negotiating with the Mujahideen," al-Zawahri said. "Bush was forced at the end of last year to announce that he will pull out his forces from Iraq, but he was giving excuses for his withdrawal that the Iraqi forces have reached a good level."

Al-Zawahri, speaking calmly but forcefully, said: "With their planes, missiles, tanks and fleets, the US forces are mourning and bleeding, seeking for a getaway from Iraq. Regarding your withdrawal timetable ... you have to admit, Bush, that you have been defeated in Iraq and are being defeated in Afghanistan and will be defeated in Palestine."

Read More...

still would not vote for harper

Harper, 46, stresses generation gap

Read More...

Read More...

ukranian christmas

January 7th is Ukrainian Christmas for those who acknowledge or celebrate this time of year according to the Julian Calendar.

Ukrainian Christmas falls on January 7th because Ukrainians use the Julian Calendar. In 1528, Pope Gregory XIII changed the Julian Calendar. The new Gregorian Calendar better represented the changing seasons. But the world's millions of Ukrainians chose to keep using the old Julian Calendar and have so ever since. The difference between the two calendars placed Christmas on January 7th. Because of the size of the Ukrainian Church, the date has become widely known as "Ukrainian Christmas.

Read More...

Friday, January 6, 2006

secret no more

Straw Secretly in Iraq for Diplomatic Talks
6 January 2006, Friday.
novinite.com/view_news.php?id=57452


British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw has landed in Iraq on a surprising diplomatic visit. He is set to meet local politicians at the British base in Basra, to the south of the country, to discuss issues including Iraq's political future. However, he will not meet the 8,000 British troops in the region but officials say their withdrawal will be discussed. Straw will also have talks with members of Iraq's new federal assembly who won seats in December 15 elections. British officials have said Jack Straw will try to persuade them of the importance of establishing a broad-based national government for Iraq as soon as possible.

Read More...

delusional us cheney

cheney has parts right: barbarism and civil societies and civilization.

however, the american government and their puppets are just as guilty of barbarism. if the us continues as it, they will continue to threaten civilization. between the us government’s so-called war on terror, their foreign policy, illegal wars, and passing off their form of democracy to the rest of the world, they are more delusional than ever.


Cheney Calls Terror War 'Struggle Between Civil Societies, Barbarism'
By Gerry J. Gilmore
American Forces Press Service
defenselink.mil/news/Jan2006/20060106_3859.html

WASHINGTON, Jan. 6, 2006 –
Vice President Dick Cheney today praised U.S. servicemembers and vowed victory in the war against terror, calling the global conflict a struggle between civil societies and barbarism. ....

"The war on terror is a battle for the future of civilization," Cheney told servicemembers gathered at the U.S. Army's Combined Arms Center at Fort Leavenworth, Kan. .....


"We can only say, with complete certainty, that these Americans served in a noble and necessary cause," Cheney said, "and their sacrifice has made our nation and the world more secure.

Read More...

spanish - british soldiers drunk

Is it too late to change to a different army?
Fri Jan 6, 2006
today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=oddlyEnoughNews&storyID=2006-01-06T144651Z_01_KNE651641_RTRUKOC_0_US-DUTCH-SOLDIERS.xml

AMSTERDAM (Reuters) -
Dutch troops helping earthquake survivors in Pakistan have complained that while they are subject to an alcohol ban, Spanish and British soldiers laugh at their austerity and turn up drunk at their campfire.

"We were told before we arrived that alcohol was banned in this country or else very difficult to get hold of and we accepted this," one soldier told the Dutch daily De Telegraaf.

"The Spanish drive around with cars full of Heineken ... and the English laugh at us when they show up at our campfire drunk," another Dutch soldier said.

A Dutch defense ministry spokesman said it was standard policy to ban alcohol in Muslim countries in line with local custom and Dutch troops were being well looked after.

"Tens of thousands of people lost their lives in the earthquake and hundreds of thousands lost everything they had," he said. "Going without alcohol is a small sacrifice toward a very good cause."

Read More...

harper should publicly retract

from earlier in the week, Conservative Negative Ads Misleading Canadians to Brison Calls for Withdrawal of Conservative Ad to Harper Wrong on Contracting ...

Minister Scott Calls on Stephen Harper to Retract Contracting Allegations
January 06, 2006
iberal.ca/news_e.aspx?id=11329


Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Andy Scott today called on Conservative leader Stephen Harper to publicly retract allegations he made in respect of contracting practice at Indian Affairs. The false allegations were made at press conference January 3, 2006 and are contained in a press release dated the same day that is currently posted on the Conservative web site.


A CBC National Reality Check has conclusively demonstrated that that these allegations are not only false, but that the information was readily available had the Conservative simply asked for it. The documents that were available to Mr. Harper can be found here.

In a letter to Mr. Harper, the text of which his attached, Mr. Scott calls on Harper to "do the honourable thing and retract (the allegations) as well as remove or edit the offending news release."

Publicly available documents
Letter from Andy Scott to Stephen Harper

Read More...

harper to create canadian cia

Harper to create Canadian CIA
Ed Hollett
06/01/2006
www.canadawebpages.com/pc-editorial.asp?Key=2074&editorType=news&editorPrimeKeyword=hollett&editorLink=RobertBond

Stephen Harper will create a Canadian spy organization like the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to collect information on threats to Canadian security, counter threats overseas and add to allied intelligence capabilities.

There is no explanation of how Harper's spy agency will counter threats overseas, although CIA has recently been aggressively capturing and reportedly torturing suspected terrorists in secret prisons overseas.There is also no explanation as to why a major foreign and security policy announcement was buried in the back of a document that for the most part focused on gun and youth crime. The release, aimed to exploit recent gun violence in Toronto, made no mention of intelligence agencies.

The Conservative plan is buried in a backgrounder to an announcement on security made on Thursday. ....

Read More...

martin not harper best choice

Address by Prime Minister Paul Martin
January 06, 2006
liberal.ca/news_e.aspx?id=11322

Good morning.

On January 23rd, Canadians are going to elect one of two people as their leader. On January 24th, either Stephen Harper or myself will be prime minister. That’s what this election comes down to. That one choice.

It’s a choice between two leaders, with two different ideas of what Canada should be, two different notions of the values it should carry into the future.

Stephen Harper wants to cancel our national child care program. He wants tax breaks that give the greatest benefit to the wealthiest among us with the most to spend. He stands against our plan to ban handguns. He would move us toward a fend-for-yourself society. A decade ago, it was Mike Harris. Today, it’s Stephen Harper. It was the wrong way to build a strong society in 1995. And it’s still wrong today.

I believe we give ourselves the best chance to succeed as a nation when we rally behind the conviction that we must leave no one behind. Perhaps at times our success lets us imagine that we can take for granted the path we’re on – the path of prosperity and opportunity. But we can’t. Our commitment to the common good must be protected.

That means supporting the values on which our country was forged – fairness and generosity and respect. And it means supporting Canadian families.

A Liberal government will support today’s families by putting in place the biggest tax cuts, the first new social program in a generation – child care – and the best plan for safer, healthier communities. We will support families with 1,000 new family doctors and a real Health Care Guarantee, to ensure timely care.

And we will support Canadian families by helping people overcome barriers to obtaining an education, getting the right training and finding a good job.

I’m here today to announce that a Liberal government will further help families by giving new support to caregivers, to seniors and to Canadians with disabilities.

Let me outline the details of these new initiatives. First, expanded support for caregivers.

When it comes to meeting the daily needs of Canadians living with chronic illness or a disability, or frail seniors, most of this care – the vast majority of it – is provided by unpaid caregivers. Family relying on family. It is critical work, hard work, and it is my belief that government ought to do more to support them – especially when they need time away from work to ensure they have the time and the energy to care for a loved one.

Therefore, I am announcing today that a Liberal government will create a new Family Leave program, which will give Canadians the opportunity to take up to two months off from work to care for a loved one who is seriously ill. Two months in which their job will be protected and benefits will be paid through the Employment Insurance fund. Two months that could make all the difference in a person’s life. You can take it all at once. Or you can take it in increments over your working life.

A Liberal government will also broaden the current EI Compassionate Care Benefit to include family members other than parents, spouses and children – because we recognize that today’s families are so varied in their makeup. We will work to extend the current benefit to part-time workers. And we will create a new community caregiving program, modeled on our successful New Horizons program for seniors.

Finally in this regard, we will provide greater support to unpaid caregivers by increasing the annual Caregiver Tax Credit by 50% to $15,000 – and we will reach out to caregivers right across our country, to make sure they are aware of what we are doing, and what programs and benefits there are to help them.

Second, supporting Canadians with disabilities.

One of the defining values of our country is our pursuit of and dedication to equality of opportunity. But Canadians with disabilities and their families face unique challenges – they are confronted by an opportunity gap – and there is a role here for government to help bridge that gap. To foster inclusion for people with disabilities – helping them achieve financial security, gain access to higher learning and contribute in the workforce.

A new Liberal government will create a Registered Disabilities Savings Plan – so that family members and others can help Canadians with disabilities save for the future. The RDSP will operate on the same principle as the Registered Retirement Savings Plan, in that savings will grow tax-free until they are accessed – giving Canadians with disabilities a new tool by which to achieve for themselves financial security.

We will also extend the Disability Tax Credit and increase the Child Disability Benefit. We will boost the refundable medical expense supplement by 33 per cent. We will invest in employability assistance programs – so that disabled Canadians who are able to work get that opportunity. And we are going to expand these programs over the next mandate. And we will earmark $135-million from the Post-Secondary Innovation Fund to improve access to post-secondary education facilities for Canadians with disabilities, which is, of course, a crucial step toward the goal of ensuring equality of opportunity for all Canadians.

Third, further supporting Canada’s seniors.

It is my belief that the things we do to support our seniors speaks to the kind of country we are. They reflect the values of fairness and generosity and respect on which our country was forged.

That’s why my government is putting in place the largest increase to the Guaranteed Income Supplement in our country’s history. That’s why we’ve delivered tax cuts that have taken hundreds of thousands of seniors completely off the tax rolls, invested to keep public health care strong and established a National Seniors Secretariat within the federal government. And that’s why we took the Canada Pension Plan – a plan that was at risk –and did the hard work of ensuring it will be there for today’s seniors, for tomorrow’s and for generations of Canadians to come.

Today, we take the next step forward to support Canadian seniors.

Many seniors today have the capacity to stay in their own homes – but find that rising property taxes and high maintenance costs can outstrip increases in annual income. In recent years, reverse mortgages have become an increasingly popular tool for seniors on fixed incomes – a tool that allows them to access a portion of the equity they have in their homes.

However, the fact is that commercial institutions that offer reverse mortgages frequently charge a relatively high rate of interest for their services.

A Liberal government will enable seniors to gain access to the equity in their homes in a way that can save them thousands of dollars compared to the status quo. We will do this by creating Mortgage Equity Access Now for Seniors – or MEANS – a program that will provide insurance for reverse mortgages through the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. This will bring down interest costs and put more money in the pockets of Canada’s seniors.

In summary, let me say that I am extremely proud of what my government has done to support caregivers, Canadians with disabilities and seniors.

I believe that our social programs, the things we do to help each other out and help each other up, speak to the kind of country we are, and the country we want to be. But living up to that goal requires national leadership. It requires a prime minister who believes in identifying a destination down the road and doing what it takes to ensure we get there together.

It’s a question of values – everyone coming together, standing side by side for the common good, for the protection and betterment of all. It is that conviction that guides us to look to the good that government can do in our society – the good it can achieve for all the different kinds of families that define the Canada we’re so proud of, the good it can do to help families by giving new support to caregivers, to seniors and to Canadians with disabilities.

Thank you.

Read More...

liberals to help seniors

Read More...

conservative harper wrong

Read More...

liberals get the facts straight

Option Canada
January 06, 2006
liberal.ca/news_e.aspx?id=11328


Reports indicate the RCMP is looking into Option Canada’s $ 4.8 million funding from the Canadian Heritage department in the lead up to the 1995 referendum on sovereignty.

Option Canada was an entirely independent non-profit organization.

THE FACTS

This is not an RCMP investigation.

Due to allegations, rumoured to be on the verge of publication by reporter Normand Lester, the Canadian Heritage department proactively referred the matter to the RCMP.

We must also not forget that these allegations are not new or particularly relevant. The Bloc has criticized the existence of Option Canada in the House for the last 10 years.

Option Canada's funding was the subject of an internal audit by the Department of Canadian Heritage in 1996, the findings of which were sent to the Auditor General. The funding was also the subject of numerous reports, all of which were made public and tabled in the House of Commons.

It is indeed true that the Government of Canada committed spending to promote its position during the pre-referendum period in 1995.

The fact that the Government of Canada defended the principle of Canadian unity could not be more normal.

Indeed, on pages 15 and 16 of its current platform, the Parti québécois clearly states that it will, if elected, commit public funds to promote Québec sovereignty. It spells out that if elected, the Parti québécois will appoint a minister responsible for achieving sovereignty, and ensure that each department of the Government of Québec drafts an action plan for sovereignty as well.

This is in no way different from the Parti québécois’ behaviour in the lead up to the 1995 referendum. The péquiste government then had set up a department, the Secrétariat à la restructuration, headed by minister Richard Le Hir and endowed with a $ 9.4 million budget.

That’s over and above all other PQ government expenditures to promote sovereignty:

Regional and national commissions on the future of Quebec: $8.5 million
Conseil de la souveraineté (pre-referendum activities): $4 million
Government mailings (draft bill on Quebec sovereignty): $3 million
Lobbying the government of the United States: $500,000
The YES Committee: $2.5 million

Not to mention:

Hydro Québec's "René Lévesque" promotional campaign: $2.8 million
The "intercultural ties" campaign: $1.2 million

Read More...

middle east cartoon

Read More...

sharon a war criminal to many

Some fear post-Sharon era, some await end of a “war criminal”
1/6/2006 9:45:00 AM GMT
aljazeera.com/me.asp?service_ID=10085


Sharon faced war crimes prosecution in court in Belgium for his role in Sabra and Shatila massacres ...

Political leaders all over the world are showing great concern to the condition of the Israeli PM who began his military career at a young age, when he became involved in fighting with the Israeli Haganah, leading commando units responsible for behind-the-lines terror attacks and forcing Palestinians flee their homes.

In August 1953, Sharon founded the infamous Unit 101, which carried out a series of attacks across the Israeli borders into refugee camps, villages and Bedouin encampments.

In September 1953, he led the same unit, attacking Bedouins in Al Auja (a demilitarised145 square km area at the western Negev-Sinai frontier), killing scores of people.

In October, 1953, he led Unit 101 in an attack on Qibya village in Jordan, and ordered his soldiers to blow up buildings, fire into doorways and windows with automatic weapons and throw hand grenades, killing 69 civilians (mostly women and children).

Later on Sharon claimed that he believed that the houses weren’t inhabited. But the UN observer who inspected the scene asserted that “one story was repeated time after time: the bullet splintered door, the body sprawled across the threshold, indicating that the inhabitants had been forced by heavy fire to stay inside until their homes were blown up over them.”

In 1971 - Under the euphemistic title the “Pacification of Gaza,” Sharon imposed a brutal policy of repression, which included blowing up civilian houses, and bulldozing refugee camps, collective punishments and imprisoning hundreds of Palestinian youths. Numerous civilians were killed or unjustly imprisoned, their houses were demolished and the whole area was effectively transformed into a jail.

In 1977, The Likud party won the general election under Begin and Sharon joined Begin’s first administration as Minister of Agriculture in charge of settlements. He was one of the strongest supporters of the religious Gush Emunim movement; calling for expanding the Jewish settlements in an attempt to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state.

In 1982, As Defense Minister Sharon masterminded the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon dubbed the “Peace for the Galilee”, killing thousands of civilians.

In June, 1982, Sharon ordered thousands of soldiers deployed on the border to fight their way up the Lebanese coast, which eventually led to the occupation of Beirut.

The soldiers carried out air and ground assaults, destroying a substantial portion of Lebanon. At least 14,000 people, mostly unarmed civilians, were killed.

August 12 became known as Black Thursday after an Israeli massive artillery barrage which lasted some 11 hours killed about 500 Lebanese and Palestinian civilians.

On September 15, 1982, Sharon gave orders for attacking Beirut, declaring that this was in order to dislodge 2000 Palestinian fighters remaining in the city, following the evacuation of PLO fighters from the region on the condition of international protection for the Palestinian and Lebanese civilians in the region. Sharon assigned the task of purging the camps gave to the Phalange (Lebanese force armed by and closely allied with Israel since the 1975’s Lebanese civil war).

The 1982 massacres of Palestinians at Sabra and Shatila refugee camps: Sharon ordered the terror attacks on the camps at Sabra and Shatila which took place between 6:00pm on September 16 and 8:00 am on September 18, 1982.

Sharon’s troops allowed Phalange forces to enter the area. But the massacre was not just carried out by these murderous Phalangist militia trained and allied with Israel, Israeli forces were also directly involved. Israeli searchlights cleansed the camps, while army personnel watched through binoculars as the death squads spreading.

Entire families were murdered, many raped and tortured before being killed. Corpses were heaped into Lorries and taken away, or buried in mass graves. The exact toll from Sabra and Shatila massacre was never known but Palestinian sources estimate that at least 2000 people were murdered.

Ha’aretz reported on September 26, 1982: “A long-term objective aimed at the expulsion of the whole Palestinian population of Lebanon beginning with Beirut. The purpose was to create a panic to convince [sic] all the Palestinians of Lebanon that they were no longer safe in that country.”

On September 28, 2000, Sharon's incursion into Al Aqsa sanctuary accompanied by at least 1,000 Israeli military personnel triggered the outbreak of Al Aqsa Intifada.

But despite holding a grudge against Israel for its failure to fully implement past agreements, the Palestinians fear Sharon’s successor, especially if Likud wins the general elections, would bury all agreements once reached. ...

“We warn of the scenario where Sharon’s successor would seek to prove himself by boosting belligerence against our people,” a Hamas statement read.

Butcher

“We are not sorry for him — to hell with him. We in Islamic Jihad and all Palestinians have no sympathy for any Zionists,” Anwar Abu Taha, a Palestinian Islamic Jihad official in Beirut, told Hezbollah's al-Manar TV station. “We do not accept he is a political leader. He is a butcher.”

In Gaza Mr. Sharon remains a hate figure from his days as army chief of the Southern Command and his 1971 policy of bulldozing Palestinian refugee camps to cleanse Palestinian fighters and subdue the local population.

“I’m so happy,” said Allah Nabil, a 23-year-old accountant from Gaza City.

“He has tricked the world, portrayed himself as a man of peace when, in reality, he was a war criminal. He has a long history of massacres here since the 1950s. This is a positive step for us.”

Bushra Saleh, 45, a teacher, said. “I hope he dies. He was very bad for the Palestinians and he made all of our lives depend on him and his decisions. This guy only knew the language of bloodshed.”

Mushir al-Masri, a Hamas spokesman, said: “The whole area will be better. This guy practised his crimes and terrorist attacks and committed massacres against our people.”

Read More...

middle east cartoon

Read More...

us joke on rules

us should practice what they preach

Russia must 'play by rules'
6 January 2006
gulf-daily-news.com/story.asp?Article=131836&Sn=BUSI&IssueID=28292

WASHINGTON:
US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice urged Russia to act responsibly following its gas row with Ukraine, which had threatened supplies to Europe and drew international condemnation.

"The game just can't be played that way," said Rice, speaking to reporters at a breakfast meeting. "When you say that you want to be part of the international economy, that you want to be a responsible actor in the international economy, then you play by its rules."

Rice said it was ironic that the dispute with Ukraine over gas prices had boiled over on the day Russia for the first time took over the chairmanship of the Group of Eight most industrialized countries.

"It was not a good week from the point of view of Russia's demonstrating that it is now prepared to act as an energy supplier in a responsible way in energy markets," Rice said.

The chief US diplomat added that she hoped Moscow had clearly understood that the political motives behind its decision to cut off gas supplies to Ukraine did not sit well with the international community.

"Nobody said that Ukraine and Russia should not eventually get to some market-based price for gas," Rice said.

"After all, everybody is trying to break down the oil structures of the Soviet Union, which were inefficient and wasteful, but when you do it in the way that this was done, with obvious political motives, of course it causes problems."

Russia cut off gas supplies to Ukraine on January 1, after Kiev rejected a price rise that would have taken the cost of gas from $50 to $230.

Read More...

iran stands up

they do make a point

Iran 'won't bow to bullies'
6 January 2006
gulf-daily-news.com/Story.asp?Article=131924&Sn=WORL&IssueID=28292

TEHRAN: Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad yesterday reiterated his tough stance on pursuing the country's controversial nuclear programme, after plans to resume fuel research were criticised by the international community.

He said Iran would not bow to Western "bullies" which already have nuclear arsenals.

"Those who have nuclear weapons and have used them in the worst way against people in the world, have no right to prevent nations from achieving peaceful nuclear energy," the ultra-conservative president told a cheering audience in Qom.

"Some of them lately have even gone so far as to say that the Iranian nation has no right to conduct nuclear research. All nations should know that if we give these bullies a chance, they will next say that you don't have the right to have universities."

Tehran on Tuesday announced plans to restart research for its "programme for peaceful nuclear energy" which was suspended two years ago, a move that prompted International Atomic Energy Agency director Mohamed ElBaradei to seek "clarifications".

ElBaradei said on Tuesday that the IAEA's board of governors wanted Iran to refrain from activities linked to enrichment of uranium as a key confidence-building measure.

Ahamdinejad, however, stressed that Iran would master the technology "in the near future, to serve in medical, agricultural, industries and energy sectors, God willing." ...


The Europeans and the United States are backing a compromise offer from Moscow to enrich Iranian uranium on Russian soil, guaranteeing Iran's access to nuclear fuel but for peaceful purposes only.

Iranian officials are to discuss the proposal with Russian officials tomorrow.

Read More...

bush still doesn't get it

Bush slams Arabic TV
Friday 06 January 2006, 4:38 Makka Time, 1:38 GMT
english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/76CBF0B1-2D77-4E0D-9C23-81052D7B926F.htm


Bush says the US is being misrepresented

George Bush, the US president, has criticised Arabic television for giving a false impression of the United States - but admitted that Americans needed to do a better job of communicating their ideals.

Launching a National Security Language Initiative to boost the teaching of foreign languages, Bush said it was a way to help combat the notion that the United States was bullying in imposing its concept of freedom.

"You can't convince people unless you can talk to them," Bush told a State Department audience.

The language initiative, which aims to boost learning of Russian, Chinese, Hindi, Farsi, Arabic and other languages, was part of a strategic plan to protect the United States and spread democracy, Bush said.

"You can't figure out America when you're looking on some of these TV stations - you just can't - particularly given the message that they spread," he said. "Arabic TV does not do our country justice."

Propaganda?

"They ... sometimes put out propaganda that just isn't right, it isn't fair, and it doesn't give people the impression of what we're about."

State Department officials said the aim of the plan was to get children involved in learning foreign languages from kindergarten and to fund more programmes through university-level and beyond.

The White House will ask Congress for $114 million in the 2007 budget to initiate the plan, involving a number of agencies including the education and defence departments.

Especially since the September 11 attacks, the Pentagon, CIA and other agencies have bemoaned a shortage of experts in Arabic and other "exotic languages", particularly for translating security information.

"We need intelligence officers who, when somebody says something in Arabic or Farsi or Urdu, know what they're talking about," Bush said.

Memories are still fresh of two messages intercepted from suspected members of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida network on 10 September, 2001, that said, "Tomorrow is zero hour", and "The match begins tomorrow". They were translated on September 11 and only given to policy-makers on 12 September.

Read More...

Thursday, January 5, 2006

damn those bloggers

Bloggers have killed Official Secrets Act, claims Murray
Not exactly. But they're not exactly in prison, either...

By John Lettice
theregister.co.uk/2006/01/05/murray_claims_official_secrets_kill/
5th January 2006 17:38 GMT

[ http://audaciousontology.blogspot.com/2005/12/murray-prints-torture-claims.html ]

Ordinarily we'd avoid mentioning the Government's unaccountable failure to gaol Craig Murray, in case we inadvertently reminded its members of something they missed from yesterday's 'To Do' list. But, as the man himself so plainly wants to draw attention to his continuing liberty, we might as well just go ahead. Bloggers, says Murray, have killed off the Official Secrets Act.

We wouldn't put it that strongly ourselves, but the Act certainly doesn't look well. Last week, Murray, a former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan*, responded to Foreign Office attempts to suppress two confidential documents by publishing them on his website and encouraging blogs the world over to republish them. Murray now claims these appeared in more than 4,000 blogs within 72 hours. We've no idea whether or not the total hit 4,000, but whatever, it's loads and loads - far beyond any number that the UK Government could ever manage to deal with.

Despite this, Murray hasn't even been questioned. "We have published," he says, "what were, undoubtedly, classified British Government documents. Under the notorious Official Secrets Act that is an offence, and everyone connected with it is plainly guilty. There is no public interest defence."

Actually, it's not the numbers as such that have kept the security forces off Murray's back. Not directly, anyway. Having the documents reproduced throughout the world certainly ensures they can never be suppressed, but has no obvious effect on any desire the Government might have to wreak awful vengeance on Murray. The reverse, if anything. Murray himself acknowledges this to an extent, observing: "British criminal trials still involve juries, and they are reluctant to convict in OSA trials, where they often sympathise with the motives of the defendant. Clive Ponting was acquitted after leaking that the Belgrano was heading home when British forces sank it. The jury acquitted him against the clear direction of the judge. And that was in the context of the Falklands War, which the British public supported. What chance of a conviction in the context of the Iraq war, which the British public oppose?"

It's also in Murray's favour that he's loudly opposing torture while the UK Government is giving every indication of skulking around conniving at it. If the Government busts Murray, his book gets more publicity, more waves of outrage will ripple through blogdom, and the jury could well chuck out the charges and render the OSA even deader than it is already. Must be annoying to have Murray crowing about it, though, when you're striving not to notice that official secrets breaches have gone global.

It occurs to us that life must be hard for the current UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, whoever they may be. All ambassadors are fairly silent by Murray's standards, but silence from the envoy to Uzbekistan these days might so easily be thought of, throughout the world, as indicating some kind of cynical, torturing, CIA stooge. For the sake of your reputation, whoever you are, we urge you to leak something, quick.

Read More...

us coalition creates damage

Bush, Ex-Policymakers, Discuss Iraq
iraq.headliner.org/headliner.php?c=us&id=309939&abbr=ap
Jan 5


... The event came on a day of new bloodshed in Iraq, where the one-day death toll from several attacks was at least 130.

The White House made the rare move of mentioning the violence. "We have seen that today has been a tough day in Iraq," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said. "We know the enemy wants to disrupt the transition to democracy and disrupt the formation of a new government. But every step of the way they have failed."...

maybe bush should be asking the iraq people, not his iraq puppets, or his other destructive peers for advice! perhaps bush should take a long hard look at his definition of democracy and freedom, and keep it to himself.


bush should enlist his children into the us military and fight for freedom. better yet, bush and his family and the rest of his peers should become citizens of iraq and live there as a resident. maybe, and only then will bush experience first hand, the daily life the iraq people had to endure under his perspective of democracy and freedom.

better yet, the us government should get out of the business of spreading democracy and freedom. you are far from a peace maker, in your world or those a world away. bush and your government are the biggest threat to humanity.

HBloodshed in Iraq Leaves 130 Dead
headliner.org/headliner.php?c=us&id=310023&abbr=ap
By JASON STRAZIUSO
Associated Press Writer
Jan 5, 11:10 PM EST


BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) -- Suicide bombers infiltrated a line of police recruits and a crowd of Shiite pilgrims Thursday as insurgents killed 125 civilians and five U.S. soldiers, escalating attacks while political factions worked to forge a coalition government.

The stark surge in post-election violence produced familiar but heartrending images on a day that was the fourth deadliest since the fall of Saddam Hussein in 2003.

A woman and an infant girl in a bright red jumpsuit lay in a pool of blood, their faces covered by a sheet as men ferried the wounded in pushcarts in Karbala, 50 miles south of Baghdad. Ball bearings lay scattered on the bare earth next to Shiite Islam's holiest shrine in Iraq.

... But in a chord struck by several politicians Thursday, the party also condemned policies it said were imposed by the U.S.-led coalition that were hampering Iraqi security forces' counterterrorism work. The Americans have increased their oversight of Shiite-dominated security forces following widespread charges of abuse, especially of Sunni Arab detainees.

"Not allowing these two ministries to do their job means exposing helpless Iraqis to ruthless terrorists," SCIRI said. "They should know that the patience of our people will not last for a long time with these sectarian dirty crimes."...

Read More...

okay to trample israeli flag

Bahraini MP flays law against burning of flags
gulfnews.com/region/Bahrain/10009690.html
By Habib Toumi, Bureau Chief
01/06/2006 12:00 AM (UAE)


Manama: Lawmaker Shaikh Mohammad Khalid on Thursday deplored the passage by Bahrain's Lower House of a penal code amendment that reinforced the protection of flags of countries with diplomatic representations in the kingdom from desecration.

Article 215 of the revised Penal Code now stipulates a two-year jail sentence and a 200-dinar (Dh1,270) fine for anyone guilty of desecrating the national flag or official logo of a country that has political relations with Bahrain.

The Islamist MP argued that people had the right to express themselves by burning effigies and flags during demonstrations.

"It is a matter of free speech and the right to protest against actions and attitudes by nations that have little respect for other nations and people's feelings," Shaikh Khalid told Gulf News.

"We all know that the only flags that are burned or trampled in Bahrain are those of Israel because of its savage aggressions against Arabs and Muslims and the United States because of its blind support to Israel. There were protests against France on the hijab issue in December 2003, but no French flag was ever burned," he said.

Council of Representatives Speaker Khalifa Al Dhahrani last week told the MPs that Bahrain should be respectful of other countries' flags and emblems if it wanted the reverence to be reciprocated.

Protestors in Bahrain in the run-up to the 2003 Iraq war and throughout the armed conflict often burned US and Israeli flags, prompting calls from the government to issue pleas to stop the practice.

The American flag was also burned at rallies staged against Israel and its perceived supporters after Israeli forces launched military operations in the West Bank.

Officials then said that burning the US flag harmed Bahrain's interests and its relations with Washington.

The amendment, passed by the elected MPs despite the opposition of Shaikh Khalid effectively rules out the desecration of the US flag and emblems, but will have no effect on people's propensity to burn or trample the Israeli flag since Bahrain has no diplomatic relations with Israel.

Read More...

way too funny

Global outpouring for sick Sharon
Pope says he is praying for peace in the Holy Land; doesn't mention Sharon.

Read More...